Abstract

Mobile apps and conversational agents are becoming popular in healthcare by improving usability and accessibility. To reveal their clinical benefits, we analyzed conversational agent usage characteristics of asthma patients within a mobile app. 

Asthma survey results and conversational agent usage data from the users of an asthma-specific mobile app (Albert Health Assistant) were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The relationships between the groups were evaluated using chi-square test. The distribution of continuous variables was checked using Shapiro-Wilk test.

Among the 254 users who completed the survey, 42.9% self-reported getting an asthma diagnosis within the last year. Most (57.1%) expected the app to be helpful for better asthma management. Also, 42.1% were not using any inhaler for asthma treatment. Fifty-three users (20.9%) interacted with the conversational agent 360 times, with a mean success rate of 88%. Voice-based interaction was higher than text-based interactions (6.78 and 2.48 times per user). While patients used both interfaces similarly (51.7% vs. 48.3%) for getting information about asthma; they primarily interacted by speaking to use functions of the application, such as setting a medication reminder or keeping an asthma diary, 72.2% vs. 27.8%, respectively (p<0.001). They also used voice interface more in other contexts out of asthma(92.1% vs. 7.9%, p<0.001).

The results highlight the potential of mobile apps and conversational agents to assist patients in managing their asthma. The higher frequency of voice-based interactions over text-based interactions indicates that patients may find it more convenient and efficient to interact with the application using voice.